🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an observance that began as a celebration and reminder of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a commercial tone, expanding to include functions where individuals of African heritage are paid to speak with predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Celebration

Originally observed in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the February's second week. Black History Month grew out of this campaign and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in winter, but also in autumn in the UK, Deutschland, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands.

The observance has evolved since those days, placing less emphasis on the histories of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and greater focus on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with lectures and artistic activities. But the way the celebration is observed is a reflection of the current political situation. How it progresses is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to weakening: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the point of it, which is to confront systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how critical it is to rethink Black History Month better than the current time in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we observed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a place where a member of parliament feels emboldened to state that “not seeing any white faces” in parts of a city is a source of worry. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are surging in Europe as a whole.

In the US, a colossal assault against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been brought, frequently with success, to the highest courts of the nation. A drive to erase Black history and legacy from the historical documents is under way. One of Donald Trump's first executive orders focused on the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Given these circumstances, the observance illustrates how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the realities of the present. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is detached from the broader ongoing work that is required. An academic expert, a professor at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she voiced worries about the fleeting superficial actions of the observance. “The difficulty with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to adapt, revise and extend actions for racial equality and recognition in such times of discouragement and concern is a challenging endeavor. There is a inclination to just eliminate events including Black History Month completely, thinking they are inadequate for current needs, or are remnants of an period that has not worked.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and legacy of campaigns for equality – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an framework that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed through the year (as some institutions are already beginning to do), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) included in school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not evade governmental matters, and leaves space for people, particularly the younger generation, to express their concerns and stories. What value has basic knowledge of the history when it fails to address the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the public spaces? Organizations who observe it should not be reassured with the neutral terminology of “unconscious bias” and alertness to “microaggressions”, but challenged by the threats that affect everyone if anti-racism is not taken seriously. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, pressing, and responsive. It could be that an entire name rebrand is required – Contemporary Black History Month.